|Home |Login |Registration |Struts Step by Step Tutorial |Hibernate Step by Step Tutorial |Spring Step by Step Tutorial |JSP Step by Step Tutorial |JDBC Step by Step Tutorial |Web Services Step by Step Tutorial |EJB fundamentals | ORACLE Step by Step Tutorial | SCJP 5.0 and SCJP 6.0 Study Guide | SCWCD 5.0 Study Guide | SCJP Tips
Java mock test | SCJP mock test | SCJP DUMP | SCBCD mock test |Java online test exam | JSP online test | ORACLE online test | Hibernate online test | Servlet online test | Struts online test | EJB online test | C online test | C++ online test | Aptitude online test

Java interview questions | JSP interview questions | ORACLE interview questions | Hibernate interview questions | Servlet interview questions | Struts interview questions | JDBC interview questions | C/C++ interview questions | Spring interview questions | JMS interview questions | Informatica interview questions | EJB interview questions | OOPS and Design Pattern interview questions
1600 PMP mock questions 1400 CAPM mock questions 800 SCJP 6 mock questions 600 OCAJP 7 mock questions 590 OCPJP 7 mock questions 556 SCWCD 5 mock questions 500 OCEJWCD 6 mock questions pdfDownload (java,struts, hibernet etc) JobsJobs and Walkins

C C++ interview questions

!!! C C++ interview questions !!!

What happens when you make call "delete this;" ??



The code has two built-in pitfalls. First, if it executes in a member function for an extern, static, or automatic object, the program will probably crash as soon as the delete statement executes. There is no portable way for an object to tell that it was instantiated on the heap, so the class cannot assert that its object is properly instantiated. Second, when an object commits suicide this way, the using program might not know about its demise. As far as the instantiating program is concerned, the object remains in scope and continues to exist even though the object did itself in. Subsequent dereferencing of the pointer can and usually does lead to disaster.
You should never do this. Since compiler does not know whether the object was allocated on the stack or on the heap, "delete this" could cause a disaster.
How virtual functions are implemented C++?
Virtual functions are implemented using a table of function pointers, called the vtable. There is one entry in the table per virtual function in the class. This table is created by the constructor of the class. When a derived class is constructed, its base class is constructed first which creates the vtable. If the derived class overrides any of the base classes virtual functions, those entries in the vtable are overwritten by the derived class constructor. This is why you should never call virtual functions from a constructor: because the vtable entries for the object may not have been set up by the derived class constructor yet, so you might end up calling base class implementations of those virtual functions

Suggested Jobs

   More Jobs >>

The information you are posting should be related to java and ORACLE technology. Not political.